The Nobel and Ig Nobel Prizes

Nobel Prize medal (Source: Wikipedia)

It seems almost pointless doing this post as no doubt those that have an interest in some of the topics here would already have heard about the Nobel Prizes, announced earlier this month, but, if not, I’ll be happy to fill you in.

In addition you might be interested in the Ig Nobel Prizes, the more light-hearted parody of the Nobel Prizes, which were announced
last month. The full list of winners of the Ig Nobel prizes is available here.

2012 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine

The first Nobel Prize was shared between Sir John B. Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka for their work on induced pluripotent stem cells. As you know all living things are made up of cells (unless you count viruses as living) and you grew from a single cell, formed by the fusion of your father’s sperm and mother’s egg. That first cell was pluripotent, meaning it was able to become any type of cell in your body, and it eventually did. As you develop your cells lose the ability to switch types and gradually become specialised so now your skin cells cannot become neurons or vice versa. The work on induced pluripotent stem cells showed that it was possible to take a skin cell and, with the addition of certain chemicals, take it back the stage where it could become any cell. There are all sorts of uses for this from cloning to growing organs for patients from their own body, eliminating the risk of it being rejected after a transplant.

2012 Nobel Prize in Physics

The Physics prize was awarded to Serge Haroche and David J. Wineland for their work in quantum physics, particularly quantum entanglement. Quantum physics is incredibly counter-intuitive, quite far removed from what I’m familiar with, but amazingly accurate so we know it has to be right. Quantum entanglement, for example, says that it is possible for two particles to become linked and then, regardless of the distance between them, share a quantum state. Their work has so far led to highly-accurate quantum clocks but it is also hoped that it can be used to create super-fast computers.

2012 Nobel Prize in Chemistry

This was another biological prize and was awarded to Robert J. Lefkowitz and Brian K. Kobilka. This prize was awarded for work on G-protein coupled receptors which allow cells to respond to many external stimuli. There’s a short summary on how they work, as well as a short explanatory video, on WEIT and I’m going to refer you there for further information.

2012 Nobel Prize in Literature

Chinese author Mo Yan received the Nobel Prize in literature. I’d never heard of him before the award but the BBC had short profile of him and his achievements.

2012 Nobel Peace Prize

Strange as it seems to me to award a prize to an organisation, the famous Nobel Peace Prize went to the European Union for contributing to “the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe.” The prize came with a fair amount of controversy and some saying that Malala Yousafzai should have received the prize. Malala is a 14-year-old Pakistani girl who was recently shot in an assassination attempt by the Taliban for activism relating to women’s education. She is currently being treated in the UK. There is now a petition on Change.org to have her nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize and there are currently 22 000 signatories.

While on the topic of the Nobel Peace Prize, the Peacemakers Museum was recently opened in Johannesburg and intends to celebrate Nobel Peace laureates with special focus on the four South African laureates, Albert Luthuli, Desmond Tutu, FW de Klerk and Nelson Mandela.

The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2012

This was not in the original Nobel prizes, and technically isn’t, but was added in 1968 after Sveriges Riksbank donated a large sum of money to the Nobel Foundation. The prize was awarded to Alvin E. Roth and Lloyd S. Shapley for developing an algorithm for matching things up.

One thought on “The Nobel and Ig Nobel Prizes

  1. Hi Mr. Evidence and Reason! Nice article. It is never too late for discussion of the Nobel Prizes, especially that pesky Peace prize. You seem to have come to the same conclusion I did regarding the awarding an organisation. I did a bit of research on this point and it turns out that it is not all that odd after all However, the real question is, SHOULD it be awarded to an organisation? If you want to find out the answer to that, then have a quick read of this …
    http://sciencedevil.wordpress.com/2012/10/16/nobel-prize-bails-out-eu/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s